BP acted ethically to a degree by paying compensatory restitution to fishermen, property owners and others in the Gulf atomic number 18a affected by the spill. They however tried to play the role of someone remediating a problem they themselves had caused. These actions were required by the U.S. government and the coast watch to protect it citizens. If BP did not do those things, they would have been subject to supernumerary penalties.
Was that primarily a problem of communication - actually having to apologize to people what BP was doing - or did BPs split role create functional obstacles?
I dont think it was a big deal operationally because I had the level-headed authority to direct BP to take any appropriate action, and if they didnt, they were subject to penalties. That was a pretty big pulsate to hold over them. It was a continual challenge to rationalise to the American public and local leaders what was going on. They were habitual to a disaster-response system where locals were in charge, and if the feds get involved they are giving support. This action had a very different legal framework that assumed federal preemption for the response to the spill.
The causes of the pitch-black blowout and gas explosion on BPs leased Deepwater visible horizon offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico are a long way from being determined.
Yet already BPs actions are facing unprecedented scrutiny, thanks to a years-long tarradiddle of legal and ethical violations that critics, judges and members of Congress say shows that the London-based union has a penchant for putting profits ahead of righteous about everything else.
Over the past two decades, BP subsidiaries have been convicted trine times of environmental crimes in Alaska and Texas, including two felonies. It remains on probation for two of them.
It also has received the biggest ever fine for...If you compliments to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment